Sunday, September 11, 2005

9-11: Happy Neo-Con Christmas!

The sky is bright and blue and cloudless, the air is still. It’s perfect flying weather, a beautiful day.

On any day In Manhattan you can always spot the tourists---they’re the ones with heads tilted back, trying to fathom the heights of the myriad skyscrapers that the locals no longer see.
But on this day even the locals are tempted to look up, just once, and gaze for a moment at what can’t be seen, and for a few seconds they hear what can’t be heard. And they remember.

It’s a beautiful day in Washington too, but some there do not shiver with dread remembrance, for today is the holiest day of the Neo-Conservative faith.

Since 1997 the Neo-Cons have been publishing position papers and essays on the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) website. Reading through the turgid prose, asinine “analyses” and laughable “logic” the Neo-Cons’ objectives are made tediously and terrifyingly clear:

The US should rule the world for its own benefit, it should increase “defense” spending to guarantee its dominance, and it should attack Iraq ASAP in order to control the oil supply on which the US depends. This is all laid out in “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century” published in 1998 and available at

The above mentioned goals are then repeated pretty much ad-nauseum in every other paper or article they have published right through to today.

In the above mentioned publication there is one particularly fascinating tidbit:

“ A transformation strategy that solely pursued capabilities for projecting force from the United States, for example, and sacrificed forward basing and presence, would be at odds with larger American policy goals and would trouble American
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor.”

Ignore the appalling sentence construction and look at the first paragraph:

What it actually says is that the US needs “forward bases” to satisfy “larger American policy goals” (and hilariously the author implies that US allies would be perfectly okay with more US military bases dotted around the world).

Now look at the second paragraph.
It says that what would really kick-start the whole process of transforming the military and projecting US power into the rest of the world would be some kind of spectacular sneak attack against the US. That, according to the Neo-Cons, would be really handy.

But wait, there’s more!

Under the section titled “The Price of American Preeminence “ we find these two gems:

"We believe it is necessary to increase slightly the personnel strength of U.S. forces – many of the missions associated with patrolling the expanding American security perimeter are manpower-intensive, and planning for major theater wars must include the ability for politically decisive campaigns including extended post-combat stability operations."

"At the same time, we have argued that established constabulary missions can be made less burdensome on soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines and less burdensome on overall U.S. force structure by a more sensible forward-basing posture; long-term security commitments should not be supported by the debilitating, short-term rotation of units except as a last resort.
In Europe, the Persian Gulf and East Asia, enduring U.S. security interests argue forcefully for an enduring American military presence.
Pentagon policy-makers must adjust their plans to accommodate these realities and to reduce the wear and tear on service personnel.
We have also argued that the services can begin now to create new, more flexible units and military organizations that may, over time, prove to be smaller than current organizations, even for peacekeeping and constabulary operations."

So the plan here is to establish enduring military bases in regions of strategic interest, minimize troop rotations whilst also reducing “wear and tear on service personnel”, and plan for post-combat stability operations whilst using smaller peace-keeping and constabulary forces than conventional wisdom suggests, or for those of you who learned “new math”, 3 - 1 = 5!

Remember, all this was written in 1998, and guess who came up with this brilliant treatise?
Amongst others; Stephen Cambone, National Defense University; David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense; Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; William Kristol, The Weekly Standard; I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, Dechert Price & Rhoads; Paul Wolfowitz, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University

If you go to the PNAC “Statement Of Principles” page you will also find these very recognizable names:
William J. Bennett, Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Norman Podhoretz, Donald Rumsfeld.

So there you have it. The Neo-Cons couldn't argue their case with logic and reason, they needed a giant fucking disaster to get their own giant fucking disaster off the ground before they, having not bothered to learn how to land, crashed it the city of their choice .

For millions of Americans and other nationalities as well, 9-11 is remembered as a tragedy.
For the Neo-Cons it is remembered as Christmas, a time to play with shiny new toys as sugarplums danced in their heads.
But with the passage of time it appears that Santa might be a fiction, and the toys are losing their luster. The G.I. Joes are missing limbs and accessories, the wheels are falling off the tanks and trucks. They don’t seem to be as much fun to play with as they were 3 years ago.
Still, when bright memory turns to melancholy, the best thing to do is stuff yourself with cake, knock down a bottle of scotch and dream of the next September Christmas.


Anonymous said...

People should be reminded about PNAC as often as possible.

Not bad, britisher.

*looks around*
*plays with bells*
*blows whistle*


Anonymous said...

Hey, is this another one of those no-reader, no-comment blogs?

You know, like ???

Hey Brit - nice start. Unfortunately for Bu$hco, big meanie Katriny blew through town like the grinch. Awww ... sorry Georgie, no 4-point approval bump for you this Xmas! Maybe next year you can blow up Venezuela if you're extra good...

- Vesti

web_geek said...

Hey Britisher,

I didn't realize you were in NJ. I'm in DE. Nice blog.... I'll check it out more often.

But for now, have you heard of

'Malodorous Cunt' or
'Melissa Laube'

Anonymous said...


I want you to join me in making a documentary. Would you help me in securing funding for our project to develop a documentary on a serious social matter that has gone ignored far too long? Social reform is a very old and timeless business that never ends. We have all heard of the “Deadbeat Dad”, but we are hardly ever exposed to the parents whom are contributing positively to their children’s lives. How often is good parenting expressed on television? Responsible fatherhood is more than establishing paternity. It also involves fathers being present in the child's life (even if divorced or unmarried), sharing economic support, and being personally involved in the child's life in collaboration with the mother. It’s relatively easy to turn on the television to view scenes of crime, to learn about the latest drug on the street, being subjected to the latest meaningless fad, or any other negative influence. What contextual force in the family and the community drives many to overcome challenges of the system to properly raise their children? We often see images of less than admirable people being lead through the system based on their deeds. The people are crying out for a larger scope of reality. There are hundreds of thousands of outstanding parents whom are loosing the battle of raising their children. Often the challenges are not drugs, crime, or poverty, but the family court and child support systems. This will be the documentary of professionals and intelligent people telling their stories. If you are inspired by penguins enduring the elements to raise their young, wait until the people view how parents are enduring hardship, financial adversity, suffering to simply have an influence in their children’s lives.

The system allows for children to be deprived, because one parent holds animosity towards the other. Child support enforcement agencies operate inadequately by ignoring the needs of struggling custodial parents while simply raising the amounts for those committed parents to endure more financial suffering. Many committed support paying parents often are assigned incorrect debt amounts with no avenue for due process. Seizures of assets are done without due process or a single day in court. We are frequently shown images of irresponsible lowdown parents going to jail for child support arrears, but educated professionals and athletes are not immune from improper and immoral imprisonment. There are concerns of why the greater part of the prison population in America is made up of people of color and the majority of millionaires are not. I know that imagery and neglectful legislation are strong contributors to that fact. Many soldiers come home to unreasonable arrears that may lead them from being heroes to instant criminals. Many parents, whom do not receive child support through federally established means, painstakingly struggle with child support enforcement to simply convince these public officials to effectively execute their paid duties. Knowing how most parents are praying and making the impossible happen is far more important than seeing a penguin walk 70 miles to mate. Let us not forget how many athletes fall prey to the systematic abyss of creating children without long-term emotional or financial vitality that is adequate enough to effectively raise their children. There are risks that are unique to athletes and entertainers whom have children. Risks that may lead to imprisonment, dreadful reputations, and anguish if this documentary is not developed. The majority of football, basketball, baseball athletes is minority, so the issues go unaddressed. Most judges have absolute power in denying parenting privileges to a parent with little or no justification. There is no accountability in courtroom decisions. There are no cameras allowed in the courtrooms. As we saw with the Katrina aftermath, there is a trend that exists of ignoring the plight of people who reside outside the spotlight of politics. It should not take a devastating incident for us to address the hardships of parenting and surviving “The System”. The incident of Katrina was horrible, but it wasn’t until the media took a stand and placed faces with misery and destitution. There are just as many untold inspirational stories as there are horror stories. Yes, there are horror stories. Once Americans received a glimpse of the tragedy, the people demanded to see more. Hearts, minds, and souls were instantly opened. WE WANTED THE TRUTH. WE CONTINUE TO DEMAND MORE OF THE TRUTH. Our spirits could not proceed without moving towards positive change. The same holds true with the project of parenting. Once the media exposes America to the truth, there will be an overwhelming demand for positive change. This documentary will promote equal rights and fair legislation for parents including the well being of children and increase the proportion of children growing up with involved, responsible, and committed parents. Should we be forced to wait 30 to 50 years or until those accountable have passed on before law makers admit that the system is inconsistent and flawed. This documentary will allow YOU to effectively promote what has been proven for positive change in America: Educate, Equip, & Engage:

• Educating and inspiring all Americans, especially fathers, through public awareness campaigns, research, and other resources.
• Equipping and developing leaders of national, state, and community fatherhood initiatives through curricula, training, and technical assistance.
• Engaging every sector of society through strategic alliances and partnerships.

This documentary will act as a stimulus for future research, programming, and policy development.

We have reserved production staff along with 2 narrator candidates and 3 honored writers. It has been determined that in order to increase diversity, we are opting for three more writers. If you have a particular artist in mind to add that special flavor to the project, please feel free to pass on my contact information. We are also adapting nationwide marketing strategies our advertisers and supporters. For example “This program is brought to you by The Smith Family Foundation in conjunction with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, BSI International, Inc., your organization, the Law Offices of Peter, Gabriel, and Went, the GT Corporation, and the Proctall & Gremble Corporation.” I have received a commitment from Adryenn Ashley of the 21st Century Pictures Group to provide camera crews and production staff for local interviews. In return, I am obligated to set-up interviews with celebrities, politicians, and athletes. Your creditability and influence strongly validate the concerns of millions of parents. I don’t not have contact information for Sean “Diddy” Combs of the Bad Boy Worldwide Entertainment Group, professional athletes, or other entertainers…Your contribution of providing me their contact information or passing-on my contact information would be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance. I greatly look forward to hearing from you. For production and accounting contacts or if you would intend to provide your personal source material or possibly interview, I may be contacted by dialing 240-252-0889 or simply e-mail You may also contact one of our partnering organizations:
BSI International, Inc.
Diane A. Sears, Managing Editor
P.O. Box 3885
Philadelphia, PA 19146-0185
Land/Voice: 215-878-0848

Best Regards,
Eli El